\underrandom doesn’t work
\underrandoms doesn’t work
\overbar works, but not in TABLE
\overbars works
\overstrike works, but not in TABLE
\overstrikes works
\understrike works, but not in TABLE
\understrikes works
The nested example
\overbar{Über} \underbar{Unterstrich \underbar{steigt
v 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context >> cont...@ntg.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars.
> >>>
> >>> - A normal underbar
> >>>
>> - A combination of both
>>>
>>> Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant
>> above the normal bar.
>>
>> I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.
>>
>> As it stands, you can nest \underba
Am 30.11.21 um 14:19 schrieb Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context:
I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.
YES, #metoo
As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside
\overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations
this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.
>
> As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes
> inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other
> combinations work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot,
> \underdash, \underrandom
hem? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above
> the normal bar.
I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.
As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside
\overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations work.
t comes to \overbar command in math mode.
> > > MWE:
> > >
> > > \starttext
> > >
> > > \overbar{1}
> > >
> > > $\overbar{1}$
> > >
> > > \stoptext
> > >
> > > In math mode the example
miss a change; is
there a
new method for overbars in math mode?
Greetings, Sebastian
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http
mode.
MWE:
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
\stoptext
In math mode the example looks broken... Did I miss a change; is there a
new method for overbars in math mode?
Greetings, Sebastian
rbar command in math mode.
> MWE:
>
> \starttext
>
> \overbar{1}
>
> $\overbar{1}$
>
> \stoptext
>
> In math mode the example looks broken... Did I miss a change; is there a
> new method for
; is there a
new method for overbars in math mode?
Greetings, Sebastian
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo
is also under/over that space. Is this
intended? Example:
\starttext
\underbar{b} \overbar{b} \underbar{b}
$\underbar{b} = \overbar{b} = \underbar{b}$
\stoptext
A fix for this would be to use \underbars{b} or \overbars{b} instead, btw.
Best wishes,
Stefan
# \NR
\numbers{text}
\overbar{text}
\overbars{text text}
# \overlaybutton
# \overlayfigure
\overstrike{text}
\overstrikes{text text}
\packed
\page[options]
\pagereference[reference]
\pagetype[name]
\paragraph
\part[references]{text}
\periods[number]
\placebookmarks[names][names|all
13 matches
Mail list logo
